Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Etcheverry analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 6 - 5 Etcheverry
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.49% of points on their second serve, while Etcheverry has won 50.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Etcheverry has won 51.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 30.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Etcheverry has saved 66.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 66.22% of matches played (W/L 49/ 25), with Etcheverry winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Etcheverry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 290/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.88% of matches (W/L 43/ 16), where as Etcheverry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55.88% of matches (W/L 19/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 11 times before with Carabelli winning 6 times and Etcheverry being victorious 5 times. They have played 29 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 15 and Etcheverry winning 14. The last match between Carabelli and Etcheverry was at the Lima Challenger, 13-08-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:23.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Etcheverry have played a deciding set 7 times, with Carabelli winning 4 times and Etcheverry 3 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 1, and Etcheverry 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.66 while Etcheverry has played against players with an average rank of 150.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Etcheverry has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Etcheverry has converted 38.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
114
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
6
Total5
2
Hard0
4
Clay5
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
31
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
63% (316-185)
Career Total W/L
64% (332-189)
64% (27-15)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$2,068,450
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Carabelli VS Etcheverry
Sportsbook
Offer
Carabelli VS Etcheverry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Tomas Martin Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 6 | 5 |
| Sets Won | 15 | 14 |
| Games Won | 143 | 139 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 22 |
| DFs (Total) | 25 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:23 | 2:31:23 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (607/914) | 72% (632/881) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (384/607) | 64% (403/632) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (144/307) | 49% (123/249) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (38/94) | 35% (39/110) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (355/881) | 42% (386/914) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 45% (5/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 57% (4/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 25% (4/1) |
Carabelli VS Etcheverry H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
72%
(
67 of
93)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-6(9) 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
87 of
133)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
58 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
81%
(
88 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
76 of
100)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-6(9) 6-2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Tomas Martin Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (27/15) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (56/39) | 55% (46/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (499/437) | 52% (425/385) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) | 61% (17/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 163 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:53 | 2:8:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.4 | 151.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1900/3024) | 67% (1678/2523) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1278/1900) | 70% (1171/1678) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (545/1124) | 51% (430/845) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (151/324) | 39% (101/260) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1282/3050) | 38% (981/2553) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 63% (12/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (21/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (25/40) | 54% (14/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 40% (6/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (19/4) | 19% (16/3) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
69%
(
82 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
42%
(
50 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-7(8) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Cazaux
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
79 of
128)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Luciano Darderi
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Dominik Koepfer
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Etcheverry Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carabelli are available here and Etcheverry photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
